Stockton City Council Votes 7-0 to Buy a New RV for $100,000 for “Public Relations”

By John Moreno

April 26, 2017

Last night the Stockton city council voted 7-0 to approve the purchase of a “Mobile Command” RV for the purpose of “improved image and public relations “. 

This seems hard to take for many residents in a city that just recently emerged from bankruptcy. Many are also suspecting Mayor Tubbs and company will use it to promote themselves in their never ending campaigning under the guise of public relations. The price tags is $86,000 for the RV plus thousands more for interior customizations. In total the budget was $100,000. This is in addition to the $300,000 he’s spending a year for two personal assistants including a public information spokesperson and $10,000 on new furniture for his office even though the city has furnishings in storage. As a council member Michael Tubbs voted NO five times against re-opening Fair Oaks Library part time at $150,000 a year saying it would force the city back into bankruptcy. At this rate of spending the city may be well on its way. 


Moves Already Being Made for 2018 Local Elections

By JR Guillory 

April 26, 2017

Tired of hearing election news? Well things won’t be good for some time. The next Statewide Primary Election has been announced for June 5, 2018. 

Some local candidates have already filed candidate committees and started their ad campaigns. Here’s the list of local candidates seeking office as of today:
McNerney for Congress

Galgiani for State Board of Equalization 2018

Bestolarides for Assessor 2018

Withrow for Sheriff 2018

Kathy Miller for Supervisor in 2018

Winn for Supervisor 2018

Committee to Elect Mousalimas, Superintendent of Schools 2018

Jay Wilverding for Auditor – Controller 2018

Tori Verber Salazar for District Attorney 2018

Shockingly, no candidates have filed their intent for office, for Stockton City Council, at this time, but Stockton City Council District 1, City Council District 3, and City Council District 5, will all hold elections in 2018. It is predictable that both, District 3 Councilman Susan Loftus and District 5 Councilman Christina Fugazi will seek re-election in their respective districts. District 1 will see a new Councilman, after current City Vice-Mayor Elbert Holman will be ineligible due to term limits. Vice-Mayor Holman was first appointed to the dais in 2008, and will have served 10 years in the Chambers.

Why San Joaquin District Attorney Verber-Salazar Needs to Recuse Herself

By Frank Gayaldo

April 25, 2017

TOP SIX REASONS Tori Verber-Salazar should recuse herself from Sheriff Steve Moore’s GunGate investigation and appoint a SPECIAL PROSECUTOR: 

1. Adamson Police Supply, Hayward, California. The Sheriff’s Office (including the Sheriff personally) was accused of receiving “substantial discounts” by stripping, selling and then buying guns. This is in clear violation of the sheriff’s own written policy, 12028(C) PC, 514 PC and 1090 GC. After six years of a bizarre on and off again investigation, Ms. Verber concluded this activity occurred, but that somehow there was no violation of criminal law. A major conflict exists because the lead DA investigator’s name, Dave Derksen, appears on a 2014 Adamson Police Supply invoice ALSO receiving a “substantial discount”. 

2. Former DA Chief Investigator Kenneth Melgoza. Melgoza is a highly respected investigator both inside and outside the DA’s office. According to Ms. Verber’s March 28, 2017 letter, Melgoza unexplainably recused himself at least twice from this investigation. On 8/18/16 Melgoza files a claim with the county stating that Ms. Verber retaliated against him for his refusal to “engage in unlawful and unethical conduct.” I personally posted on Facebook Melgoza’s claim on 3/27/17. Within 24 hours of me posting Melgoza’s claim, Ms. Verber exonerates Moore in “GunGate”, and blames Melgoza for the case taking six years to conclude. 

3. Brook’s Arms and Ammo. Deputy District Attorney Grant Leonard Carey Brooks wears two hats: with one he sometimes prosecutes criminal cases where firearms are involved. With his other hat, he allegedly sometimes handles the disposition of those very same evidence firearms, utilizing his Federal Firearms License and company, Brooks Arms and Ammo. Conflict of interest? 

4. According to 18005 PC, the district attorney may sometime have DIRECT legal influence over what evidence firearms are retained or sold by the sheriff. 

5. According to Ms. Verber’s 3/28/17 letter which was written by Assistant District Ronald Freitas, neither the FBI or the US Attorney has commented on the case one way or the other. It was highly inappropriate to conclude this investigation without their input. The FBI should be investigating both the Sheriff AND the District Attorney for public corruption in regards to the mishandling of evidence firearms. 

6. After six years, the public still does not know how much of a “substantial discount” Sheriff Moore and other sheriff employees received on government property. This is property that according to 1090 GC, they should have never been able to purchase at ANY price. Moore refuses to answer even basic questions about the case because Ms. Verber still has yet to provide the public her “final report”.


By Frank Gayaldo

April 16,2017

San Joaquin County-Tori Verber-Salazar’s March 28th “oddly written letter” purports it is only “of concern” but not illegal that evidence guns of “unknown histories and origins” were stripped and sold to Adamson Police Supply in Hayward, California and then purchased by select deputies including Sheriff Moore at unspecified “substantial discounts”.  
Sheriff Moore flatly denies ever selling evidence guns in his April 28, 2016 KCRA 3 interview with Melinda Meza. All attempts so far to reconcile Moore’s statements with the DA’s initial findings (who still hasn’t issued a “final report” so Moore says he won’t answer questions) has proven futile. 
209 Times has now unearthed new documents from the County strongly suggesting the District Attorney’s Office was anything but a “disinterested third party” as Sheriff Moore claimed. 
Here is a sample of documents proving that the District Attorney’s Office was also conducting business with Adamson Police Supply in Hayward, and that they too were receiving unspecified “substantial discounts”, in this instance on some body armor.  

David Derksen (who replaced Chief Investigator Kenneth Melgoza who allegedly recused himself from investigating GunGate on at least two occasions) is referenced in one of Adamson’s invoices dated July 25, 2014. Almost exactly one year later on July 30, 2015, Derksen would be assigned to interview Sheriff Moore about GunGate. One of the Kevlar vests mentioned in the invoice was for “J Rocha”, who is the District Attorney’s Investigator who interviewed me on 1/27/2016 about Adamson Police Supply and the Sheriff. 

In that interview Rocha never disclosed to me the District Attorney’s own apparent practice of receiving “discounts” from Adamson Police Supply in Hayward, or that former DA Chief Investigator Kenneth Melgoza allegedly recused himself from the investigation on at least two occasions. (If he had, I would have not shared with him my documentation but instead went directly to the State Attorney General’s Office to file a complaint regarding a clear conflict of interest.) 

Not Sheriff Steve Moore nor DA Tori Verber Salazar have yet to answer if a sheriff employee recently arrested in part for having alleged ties to the Northside Gangster Crips obtained any of the evidence guns such as Uzis that Sheriff Moore once claimed he never sold. 
While questions about GunGate continues to linger and expand amongst the public, it appears that the San Joaquin County Sheriff and District Attorney could have a new friend with the ATF, which has failed to act in another case recently: 
“ATF believed education is the most effective way to stop the growing trend of law enforcement officials engaging in the business of unlicensed firearms dealings,” Harden said in the advisory. “It is our goal to educate, not investigate, to ensure law enforcement officials comply with federal law in order to avoid unnecessary public embarrassment to themselves and your Department/Agency.”

Meanwhile guns that were supposed to destroyed by law enforcement are showing up back on the street and the public is waiting for real answers. 

Was the Trial of Ashley Drain Pre-Decided? Juror #7 Says Yes After Being Removed as Only Black Juror Who Voted Not Guilty

By Motecuzoma Sanchez 

April 13, 2017

San Joaquin, CA- After the two week trial for former Manteca school board member Ashley Drain ended today jurors were sent to deliberation on charges that she purposely filed false candidate statements in the election that put her on the school board back in 2014. Juror #7 had been selected in the jury pool and sat through the trial for those two weeks. She was the only African American juror amongst an otherwis all white jury. The defendant is also African American. 

Juror #7, better known to the community as San Joaquin Delta College Trustee C. Jennet Stebbins in an exclusive interview with 209 Times says no less than five minutes after closing statements jurors were introducing themselves during the beginning of deliberation and before they were even completed, saying they were voting GUILTY. “It seemed to me they were already set on voting guilty even though we hadn’t had the chance to deliberate over the evidence yet”, she says. 

“We took a vote and it was 11-1. I voted ‘not guilty on all charges’ and they told me I had to vote ‘guilty’. When I refused to change my vote the foreman accused me of being racially biased and went to tell the judge that I was being ‘uncooperative’ and ‘biased’, but I heard things in the trial that to me didn’t seem right”, says Stebbins. 

She says some of the things during the trial that caused her concern besides being the only Black juror, were question asked to the defendant like if she voted for Trump for president by deputy district attorney Stephen Maier. Even though a decision of 11-1 was already reached she felt some jurors were in concert with the prosecutor and that anything other than a 12-0 guilty vote would not be allowed. 

This is not the first time District Attorney Tori Verber-Salazar’s office had to deal with controversy regarding racial bias. Last year pictures were leaked showing her staff mocking Black Lives Matter activists while simulating cocaine use during an office party on the clock. Verber-Salazar would apologize for that and supposedly take corrective action. 

Stebbins would be removed as juror #7 and an alternate was called in. Without having to wait for the official announcement she already knows what the verdict will be. It wasn’t allowed any other way. 

6 Years Later, Sheriff Moore is Cleared by District Attorney Verber-Salazar, but Still No “Final Report” on His Illegal Gun Sales

By Frank Gayaldo

April 7, 2017

Sheriff Moore falls over himself praising Tori Verber Salazar’s March 28, 2017 letter that memorializes his criminal behavior that is in violation of 514 PC, (public embezzlement); 12028 (C) PC (public auction required when selling evidence guns); and 1090 GC (government employees can’t buy government property they sold, regardless of price). 

Moore even oddly praises the FBI who has never released a public comment on the matter. 

Maybe Tori simply does not understand the law because she graduated from one of the worst, never accredited and now defunct, law schools in the country

Moore says he won’t say anything further until Tori’s “final report” comes out. How convenient for an elected official who doesn’t want to say how much of a “substantial discount” he received on a $1,500 gun he most likely received for free. 

Six years, and still no “final report”. Is that how DA Tori plans to keep justifying refusing to answer where $100,000 of illegal gun money went? Why not tell the public just how big those “substantial discounts” were, and where the money from the illegal sale of Uzi’s and other guns against court order went? 

Meanwhile, thanks to GunGate II, another 950 law-abiding citizens are being deprived of their guns currently in the possession of the Sheriff, apparently so Moore can have another secret garage sale. 

We await that “final report”. 

Gungate II: a Sheriff, a DA, a Chief Investigator, Guns, Drugs, and Public Corruption. 

By Frank Gayaldo

April 6, 2017

San Joaquin, CA- District Attorney Verber-Salazar fully and unequivocally acknowledges in a March 28, 2017 letter to Sheriff Moore that evidence guns were stripped to their frames and then employees, including Sheriff Steve Moore, himself received these same guns at undisclosed “substantial discounts”. This is exactly what sheriff critics including this author have been alleging, but is in direct conflict with what the Sheriff has claimed in multiple news reports. Watch here for coverage by KCRA 3. 

Sheriff Steve Moore and DA Verber-Salazar

Legal professionals, including her own subordinates, have expressed while she memorialized the sheriff’s actions, she oddly failed to acknowledge this was in clear criminal violation of 514 PC, felony public embezzlement; 1090 GC that explains civil servants cannot negotiate contracts that benefit themselves personally; and finally 12028 (C) PC, which is the Penal Code mentioned in the Sheriff’s very own policy manual requiring that IF the highly discouraged practice of evidence guns are to be sold, that it MUST be done via a public auction. 

Sheriff Moore praised the DA’s findings in a press release also dated March 28, 2017. Moore also inappropriately thanks the FBI, even though they have yet to say anything publicly about his case. Regardless, Sheriff Moore is currently a free man. DA Salazar blames her former Chief Investigator Kenneth Melgoza for the investigation taking so long. 24 hours prior to DA Salazar publicly blaming Melgoza, I posted on Facebook Melgoza’s formal claim that DA Salazar had retaliated against him for not disclosing his participation in an investigation being conducted by the FBI. Melgoza went on to say under penalty of a felony that he refused to engage in “illegal and unethical conduct”. 

Claim filed against DA Verber-Salazar by her Chief Investgator

GunGate’s investigation was limited to alleged criminal actions occurring only between 2011 and 2012. Approximately $100,000 worth of gun sale proceeds from 29 guns were shuffled into an off the books in-store credit that the DA, Sheriff and County Counsel so far refuse to publicly share any accounting of whatsoever, despite this being taxpayer money. 

Salazer admits selling stripped evidence to employees at “substantial discounts” is “of concern” and that “these practices should not continue in the future”. Yet in the very same letter she also says this is not a criminal violation. Unfortunately the DA has chosen to do absolutely nothing to ensure “these practices” do not continue, SO THEY WILL. In fact things are getting much worse and growing in scale.

An interoffice Sheriff memo dated Oct 21, 2015 has now resurfaced which was written a few months AFTER the 7/26/15 Stockton Record’s front page article “SJ Sheriff’s Office Allegations that guns improperly sold, purchased” but BEFORE Stockton Record’s 4/26/16 front page article “DA investigates Gungate”. In both these two articles and in numerous television interviews, Moore boldly purports no evidence guns were sold. Again see DA Verber’s letter 3/28/17 that clearly states evidence guns WERE sold and in fact purchased by Sheriff employees including Moore himself.

This 2015 interoffice memo is highly disconcerting for a variety of truly horrific reasons, but some issues are specifically relevant to what is now being dubbed “GunGate II”. According to this memo, “there are approximately 750 handguns (and 200 long guns) that have been processed through IBIS, which can be released to their owners, however, this has not been done.” The memo also notes that the “gun vault is being used to store narcotic evidence” and that “much (meaning not all) stored here is placed in evidence envelopes”. 

How can drugs NOT in evidence envelopes be properly tracked?

 Is this part of the reason 10,000 pieces of evidence are alleged to be missing from the Sheriff’s evidence room? 

Why are approximately 950 guns not being returned to their owners “if they can be released”? 

Are these 950 guns being staged to be sold at a future date once the dust of GunGate I settles? 

If not, why are they still quietly being held even after the media is raising concerns about the mishandling of guns? 

Have all these been properly entered into the Automated Firearms System, unlike in GunGate I where documentation exists that clearly proves evidence guns were not entered? 

Will DA Tori Verber-Salazar protect nearly 1000 law-abiding citizens from having their guns stolen from them by the Sheriff in GunGate II, or will she handle it just as she did in GunGate I, where she expressed “concern”, but not enough to take actual legal action as she did in the case of CevicheGate. 

Why has Sheriff Moore hired back his former retired Assistant Sheriff Myron Kelso at a biweekly pay of over $5000 to clean up the evidence room if there isn’t a problem with the handling of evidence in the first place? 

Did the DA, FBI or US Attorney’s Office question why 950 guns have yet to be returned to their legal owners, or did they know about it? 

The entire public, including an approximate 1000 gun owners who are directly being severely impacted by this, deserves a comprehensive and honest response from DA Verber-Salazar. Will she even respond at all? She hasn’t so far  to 209 Times. 

If you or someone you know have ever had a missing or stolen firearm, jewelry or other items of value, contact the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Office at 209 468-4310 to see if they will admit they might have it in their possession, but just do not want to give it back. 

209 Times will be releasing the October 2015 memo that call into question how a truly shocking and horrendous increase in rapes may be impacted by additional problems occurring within the Sheriff’s evidence room that have been documented by honest sheriff employees willing to risk their careers, and possibly even their very lives for justice. 

Related Articles: 


Michael Tubbs’ Treatment of His Own Brother Proves He’s a Fraud


By RJ Durand

 I read an article on 209times about Antony Tubbs, the unknown half brother of our current Mayor Michael Tubbs. Needless to say this left me deeply saddened. I honestly can’t understand how someone’s whole political career has been predicated on assisting young men of color escape the cradle to prison pipeline, yet our Mayor can not be compelled to assist his own half brother to improve his station in life. Some of his supporters can try and dismiss it as a family situation or personal differences (which Anthony has eliminated as a motive in his in) but, the real true problem is Michael Tubbs has been exposed as hypocrite. 

On one hand Michael promotes himself as a youth who overcame Stockton’s odds to go on to get a Stanford education and return home to help his city (as a politician) because his cousin got murdered. He claims he never had his father because he was in prison. He co-chairs My Brother’s Keeper initiative started by President Obama along with another grifter Sammy Nunez of Fathers & Families. It seems they have both both found a way to use the plight of Stockton’s youth as a vehicle to self promotion, politics, and pay days. 

Anthony is the archetype for an at-risk youth our Mayor has spent his political career claiming to assist. He is the one who really has been living the life and surviving the struggles Michael claims to have. He did grow up around gangs and struggles to find employment. He did drop out of school because he had no positive influences and support system like Michael did in the International Baccalaureate program and Stanford and now mayor. 

As a black man myself and someone who has a younger brother I am appalled of the actions or lack of actions taken to help Mr Anthony Tubbs by our Mayor, not only as his brother but, by someone in a position to do so who fashions themselves as a champion of “boys and men of color”. Despite his brother Anthony fitting the bill of exactly what an at-risk youth is, Michael has chosen to ignore him while living only minutes away for 20 years. While Michael goes around giving speeches, Anthony continues to live on the border line of being a statistic. If we can’t rely on Michael Tubbs to be his own brother’s keeper how can we possibly rely on him to “reinvent” our community? 

Without a doubt I am convinced now that Michael Tubbs is a fraud.